Brittany Furlan Lee has submitted new evidence to the court as part of her catfishing case against Falling in Reverse singer Ronnie Radke, as reported by a fan on Reddit. The evidence includes messages and statements from Furlan Lee.
A fan on Reddit shared details about the new evidence, noting its potential implications.
“More ‘evidence’ Brittany decided to add to the case. It doesn’t look good. These messages are part of Brittany Furlan’s declaration that was submitted a week ago. They have additional parts that we haven’t seen before. The court date has been moved to March 17, 2026,” the fan wrote in the post’s caption.
In the new court document, Brittany Furlan Lee stated that the anonymous communications she received began after Radke allegedly started harassing her. “First, before Radke started harassing me, I had never received these type of anonymous ‘spam’ communications from what appear to be burner numbers. As stated above, I had been informed by persons close to Radke that he would use technology to ’spoof’ his number so that he could send messages that appeared to be different than his verified number,” Furlan Lee said.
Furlan Lee further detailed an instance where she tested her suspicion that Radke was behind the “R Harassment” number. “Because I suspected Radke was behind the ‘R Harassment’ number, I asked how much he had won or lost in online gambling that day and, within a minute, he responded, ‘Lost 3K.’ I then checked the online platform where you can view a player’s activities, and it reflects that Radke had lost approximately 3K gambling that same day,” she stated.
The court date for the case has been rescheduled to March 17, 2026. The legal concept of “spoofing” involves intentionally falsifying the origin of communication to disguise the sender’s identity. This practice is often used in scams and harassment campaigns.
The allegation of using burner numbers and spoofing technology points to a sophisticated attempt at creating plausible deniability for the alleged harassment. Such tactics are common in cyberbullying cases where the perpetrator seeks to avoid direct attribution.
The scandal involving Radke and Furlan began in May 2025 when Furlan said she had been catfished by someone impersonating Radke on Snapchat and communicating with her privately. Radke denied any involvement and claimed the accounts were fake, but the dispute escalated publicly on social media, with Furlan later accusing him of using burner accounts to harass her.
The conflict intensified in early 2026 when Radke attempted to file a temporary restraining order against Furlan over alleged harassment, though the court denied the request, while the situation also drew comments from Furlan’s husband, Tommy Lee, further fueling the online feud.
Catfishing cases can involve a wide range of deceptive online behaviors, including impersonation and the manipulation of communication channels. The depth of the alleged deception can significantly impact legal proceedings and public perception.
