New details have emerged regarding Brittany Furlan’s restraining order against Falling in Reverse singer Ronnie Radke, following their recent catfish scandal. The information was reported by TMZ, revealing the specific terms and duration of the court-ordered protection.
TMZ obtained court documents that outline the judge’s ruling and the specific restrictions placed on Radke following a March 17 hearing.
“According to court docs, obtained by TMZ, a judge granted Brittany’s request for a civil harassment restraining order following a March 17 hearing where both Brittany and Ronnie were present,” TMZ reported. “The judge ultimately ruled in Brittany’s favor, issuing a restraining order set to expire on March 20, 2028.”
The restraining order includes strict distance and contact restrictions for the Falling in Reverse frontman.
“Ronnie is ordered to keep his distance from Brittany with docs saying he must stay at least 100 yards away from her, her home, and her workplace and he cannot contact her either directly or indirectly in any way,” the report continued.
The restraining order stems from a catfish scandal involving Tommy Lee’s wife Brittany Furlan Lee. It will remain in effect for nearly two years.
The legal victory represents a significant escalation in what began as an online dispute between the social media personality and the rock musician. The case has drawn attention due to the unusual nature of the alleged harassment and the high-profile individuals involved.
Perez Hilton revealed that the catfish scandal involved Radke allegedly impersonating Furlan online to harass her contacts, which escalated their ongoing online feud. The court documents reveal that this behavior was part of a broader pattern of harassment that prompted Furlan to seek legal protection.
Loudwire noted that Furlan described Radke’s behavior in court documents as a systematic pattern of harassment tied to their past interactions. The two-year duration of the restraining order reflects the court’s assessment of the severity of the alleged conduct.
The case highlights the growing legal consequences of online harassment, particularly when it involves impersonation and targeted harassment campaigns. The court’s decision to grant the full two-year restraining order suggests that the evidence presented was substantial enough to warrant extended protection.
The restraining order requires Radke to maintain a 100-yard distance from Furlan, her residence, and workplace. It also prohibits any form of direct or indirect contact. This comprehensive approach ensures that Furlan has legal recourse if any violations occur during the nearly two-year period the order remains active.
